I choose to look at this article because it
deals with the crisis in Syria that has been in the news a lot lately. There
has been a lot of talk about another war and debates about whether or not
American interference in yet another international country dealing with a civil
war should happen.
This article brings in both international
politics and predictions of the mass media on strikes that could possibly be
carried out in Syria.
I think international coverage of politics is
very interesting. After reading this article, I realized that international
predictions are so different than domestic political predictions.
Internationally, there are so many countries with deep rooted histories and
ties with each other and relations that these countries have goes back decades
if not centuries before America was even named.
These political leaders, especially in the
Middle East, are in control and very powerful. Also the media availability in
most of the counties is also state run. Therefore, everyone is not privileged
to freedom of media as a lot of other European countries and America are. There is not a freedom of the media to
investigate the actions of their government; therefore, more goes unknown until
it is publicly carried out and too late- i.e. Syria chemical weapons attack. I
do think that one of the main reasons for journalism is to be able to flush out
what needs to be flushed out like in government and politics in order for the
American citizens to make an informed decision for themselves, even though this
usually doesn’t happen unfortunately.
http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2013/08/31/statement-president-syria
No comments:
Post a Comment